The Dopefly Tech Blog

<< The Dopefly Tech Blog Main page

Rethinking the State of Frameworks

posted under category: ColdFusion on March 15, 2006 at 1:00 am by MrNate

A couple of responses to my recent entry about the state of OOP in CF:

Ryan Guill had a good response about the need for us to become better programmers before we marry ourselves to any frameworks, which is a valid point. The comments further his point that we don't want people working on frameworks unless those people know why they are doing it. This is always a valid question: what problem are you trying to solve by using a framework? The same principal works for design patterns, language and development platform choices, development tools and so on.

Sean Corfield has some great input about some of my points. The all-in-one framework one, in particular, he says is just a bad idea. Truthfully, I can see it both ways.

There's a lot of frameworks, and we shouldn't discourage the use of any that do their jobs well. Saying that one is the only one to use would discourage others in thinking for themselves and making informed choices.

On the other hand, how many conversations have we had in the last year on various lists about "which framework should I use?" It would be nice to solve this for once. I personally know developers who don't choose to use one because it's not clear when and where to use which framework. Sometimes even I fall into this category. Something as simple as a chart that lays out the frameworks, where they all fit in and how to tie them together would be so, so useful. I've got an idea for this, I'll keep you posted.

I concede that there is no one-size-fits-all framework, but there are a lot of folks out there still scratching their heads.

I'll continue on this subject later - thanks, everyone for your feedback, both in comments and in blogs. I'm enjoying the discussion!

Too old to comment!
On Mar 15, 2006 at 1:00 AM Brian Rinaldi (brinaldi at the ever famous remotesynthesis.com) said:
There isn't a chart that I know of, but Sean has his frameworks sample code you can use for comparison or the CF Pet Market site (http://www.cfpetmarket.com) that was set up in conjunction with a CFDJ that showed many of the major frameworks and discussed the differences you are asking about.

On Mar 15, 2006 at 1:00 AM Calvin (cward who really likes ecfl.com) said:
In order to have a chart, which could be useful, I think we'll first need to discuss what attributes have value and how to measure those attributes...

On Mar 15, 2006 at 1:00 AM Nathan Strutz (http://www.dopefly.com/) said:
Brian, you're right, I think the best thing we have right now is Sean's framework presentation.

Calvin, I like where you're going with those thoughts. Do you have some suggestions for the basic attributes? And I hope "performance/speed" isn't one of them.
Too old to comment!